In an angry letter to the chair of the House panel investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection, Ohio Republican representative Jim Jordan has refused the panel’s request for an interview, saying in part, “The American people are tired of Democrat’s nonstop investigations and partisan witch hunts.”  

Does anyone believe that Jordan and other Republicans would have argued the same position if Hilary Clinton and her supporters had refused to accept the results of the presidential election of 2016 and taken even 10 percent of the actions (including the Jan. 6 insurrection) that Donald Trump and his supporters have taken in disputing the 2020 election?

Recommended for you

(1) comment

baytownbert

The real credibility issue is that anyone would attempt to defend the Biden Administration's absolute shamble of governing. Citing Hillary, another giant credibility issue. Who in their right mind would use her as an example of ethics?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.