It’s been a bad few weeks for Dum-Dum Trump. Could it get any worse? Just wait and see.

Former White House adviser (Republican) Steve Bannon has described the Trump Organization as a criminal entity and predicted that investigations into the president’s finances will lead to Trump’s political downfall, when he is revealed to be “not the billionaire he said he was, just another scumbag”.

(Republican) Robert Mueller just testified that he disagreed with Trump’s Atty Gen Barr’s conclusion that Trump was innocent of a crime concerning obstruction of justice and Russian tampering in the 2016 election.  Mueller said Congress must decide on Trump’s crimes, alluding to impeachment as the next constitutional step.

Calls for the impeachment of Humpty Trumpty grow louder as 1000 former federal prosecutors say Trump must be indicted on obstruction of justice charges.

Spoiled brat Trump said he knew nothing about disrespecting a legendary war hero by putting a tarp over the name of the USS John McCain battleship. Of course lying Trump didn’t know. Just like he didn’t know about the hush money payment to a porn actress or the 2016 negotiations to build a Trump tower in Moscow. We now know these were just two of over 10,000 lies Trump has regurgitated since 2016.

(Republican) Meghan McCain said it best, “Trump is a child who will always be deeply threatened by the greatness of my Dad’s incredible life.”

Low IQ Trump was caught misspelling simple words like “Kentucky” and “accomplishments.” Once he misspelled his third wife’s name as “Melanie.” Trump’s former Business and Finance Professor at the University of Pennsylvania said Trump was one of the dumbest students he ever had. Former Sec of State (Republican) Rex Tillerson felt the same describing Trump as a bleeping moron.

As Trump Republicans swirl down the toilet, I now understand what Hillary Clinton meant in 2016 when she said, “Donald Trump is unfit to be President.”

So sad to watch the GOP implode because of a scumbag like Trump. I can already hear the 2020 campaign chants, “Lock him up, lock him up.”

Alan Hudgins

Baytown

 

(17) comments

rmartin

Well Alan collusion didn't get him like all you brilliant democrats said so now it's his financial dealings? How long will this take Alan? Which of the brilliant 24 candidates is going to take him down?

Frank

Right on, Alan. It seems to me the Republicans see Trump as their best hope to win, and most are willing to sacrifice truth, honor, and principles in order to preserve power. There are a few outliers like Justin Amash, conservatives who recognize Trump for who he is and have the courage to stand up to him. Truth matters. If Trump wants the investigations over, he should immediately provide his tax returns (he once promised to do that) and financial records. After all, he supposedly has nothing to hide, so these documents should quickly clear him of all wrong-doing. (cough, cough) N/A, more than 1,000 former federal prosecutors (Democrats and Republicans), say that the Mueller Report has more than enough evidence to warrant an indictment of Donald Trump for obstruction of justice. How do you sweep that under the rug, N/A?

rmartin

Hey Alan and Frankie can you tell us exactly what Trump obstructed? Since no crime was committed as per Mueller what could Trump obstruct? Tell us...

Frank

Here are the issues in the Mueller report that prosecutors say scream of obstruction according to Axios. 1. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn. 2. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBI's Russia Investigation. 3. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Comey. 4. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel. 5. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel's Investigation. 6. The President's Efforts to Prevent Disclosure of Emails About the June 9, 2016 Meeting Between Russians and Senior Campaign Officials. 7. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation. 8. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel. 9. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort, [redacted in the Mueller report due to ongoing matter]. 10. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen. Come on N/A, tell us how the 1,000 former federal prosecutors (from both parties) are wrong and you are right. I’m sure your expertise in legal matters is only surpassed by your extensive background in climatology.

Frank

Here are a few quotes from the Mueller Report. Spin these, N/A. “If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state.†“Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations,†Mueller wrote. “The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General’s recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony.†“The President’s efforts to influence the investigation were mostly unsuccessful, but that is largely because the persons who surrounded the President declined to carry out ordewrs or accede to his requests.â€

rmartin

Hey bubba Frank, nothing you mentioned is a crime. Attempted to influence, now that is funny. Trump made everyone available, turned over 1.5 million documents. TRUMP WAS CHARGED WITH NOTHING. I know it's hard to get that through your thick head. It's over, Act 1 is closed. Act 2 is about to open with Obama officials on the hot seat.

Frank

N/A, if none of this is a crime, explain why 1,000 federal prosecutors (republican and democrat who are trained in the law) disagree. Do you have a law degree like those prosecutors? Like I said your expertise in legal matters is only matched by your vast knowledge of climatology. Mueller did not indict Trump because his assumption was that a sitting president could not be charged with a crime, and never considered that as an option. Mueller's view is that impeachment was the only way a president could be held accountable for criminal acts. Bottom line: Your belief that Trump is innocent of obstruction because Mueller did not indict him is not based on facts, typical of your opinions. Read Mueller's lips, N/A. "If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."

rmartin

Frankie, get real. It's over, the top law officer is U.S. Attorney Barr and he said no collusion and no obstruction. I don't care what Mueller is saying now after agreeing with Barr's assessment. ITS OVER, what is it about this that you don't understand? Attorney Barr can't be overturned. Write your long boring responses that mean nothing. The only thing you desperate democrats can do is impeach and I say go for it......

Frank

Well, N/A, you are delusional as usual. Mueller did NOT agree with Barr's infamous summary. You don't care if the president is a lying, egotistical, racist criminal, because he's YOUR lying, egotistical, racist criminal. If Obama had done a tiny fraction of the acts perpetrated by Trump, you would be in an apoplectic frenzy, screaming for him to be imprisoned. You know that's true. It's called hypocrisy. It may be over in regards to collusion, but it is certainly NOT over in regard to obstruction of justice. You wrote "I don't care what Mueller has to say". Translation: you have zero interest in finding truth. You have the worst case of disconfirmation bias I have ever encountered. Truth matters. I hope this post is not too long for you to read.

rmartin

Frankie, I'm afraid he did and also you wouldn't know it because you watch the DNC news networks but less than 2 hours after Mueller's speech the Justice Department issued a rebuttal on Mueller's comment about the reason Trump wasn't indicted. He also told Barr (3) times with witnesses that not indicting a sitting President had nothing do with the Special Councils conclusion of no collusion. That's the facts Frankie whether you believe it or not. Seems like you would be getting tired of being wrong on this Trump Russian collusion matter.... Change the channel Frankie and get the real facts instead of the goofy Democratic talking points. Once again there was no crime committed by Trump. The Special Council was created without a specific crime to investigate. That's another fact Frankie. COLLUSION is not a crime of which their was none. No Collusion and no obstruction. OVER Frankie......

rmartin

Hey Frankie, google "Mueller and Barr Team Up to Blast Misinterpretations: No Conflict on Obstructions" by Jerry Dunleavy & Daniel Chaitin, May 29, 2019. Frankie it's really getting hard for me to say apology accepted.....

Frank

I read the article, and it does nothing t0 prove your opinion. My guess is that you only read the title since you are not inclined (like your idol) to read lengthy articles. In fact, the article supports my position, that the Mueller Report does not clear Trump of obstruction of justice. 1,000 federal prosecutors agree with me. Show me 1,000 prosecutors who do not think Trump should be indicted. The guy is a probably a criminal, and would have been indicted already if he was anyone besides the president. Here's another question that I'm sure you don't have the courage to answer: Would you have defended Obama if he had committed the same acts as Trump? It's not over. Read Mueller's lips, N/A. "If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."

rmartin

Frankie, I don't care if 10,000 prosecutors agree with you. Just because the idiot Democrats think something is so it doesn't make it legal. Trump will not be charged..

Frank

I believe you, N/A. You truly don’t care if 10,000 prosecutors think Trump should be indicted, which helps me make a great point - You actually don’t care what facts are presented to you. You are determined to believe what you want to believe and no amount of evidence to the contrary will change your mind. How else could you continue to support a man who, by now, has told us 11,000 lies. Oh, I notice you avoided my question. What a surprise!

rmartin

Frankie, the evidence said innocence from Mueller and 18 Democrats. President Trump on the job for 2 1/2 years and still going strong tells me I'm right and Frankie is wrong.

baytownbert

Have you two ever thought of meeting in the Octagon?

rmartin

Hey Bert I would love that......

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.